Joe Taylor, K1JT, Steve Franke, K9AN, and Bill Somerville, G4WJS
April 22, 2019
Introduction: FT4 is an experimental digital mode designed specifically for radio
contesting. Like FT8, it uses fixed-length transmissions, structured messages with
formats optimized for minimal QSOs, and strong forward error correction. T/R
sequences are 6 seconds long, so FT4 is 2.5 × faster than FT8 and about the same
speed as RTTY for radio contesting. FT4 can work with signals 10 dB weaker than
needed for RTTY, while using much less bandwidth.
Basic parameters: FT4 message formats are the same as those in FT8 and encoded
with the same (174,91) low-density parity check code. Transmissions last for 4.48 s,
compared to 12.64 s for FT8. Modulation uses 4-tone frequency-shift keying at
approximately 23.4 baud, with tones separated by the baud rate. The occupied
bandwidth (that containing 99% of transmitted power) is 90 Hz. Threshold sensitivity for
50% decoding probability is S/N = –16.4 dB, measured in the standard 2500 Hz
reference noise bandwidth. A priori (AP) decoding can push threshold sensitivity down
to –18 dB or better.
Installation and Initial Setup
To join the FT4 test group and participate in one or more upcoming “mock contest”
practice sessions, follow these steps to install and configure a release candidate for
1. Download the installation package from a link to be provided.
2. Install the program in the usual way for your operating system. To avoid conflict
with your normal operation, you may wish to use a different installation directory
from that used for WSJT-X 2.0.
3. Start the program as you normally would for FT8.
4. From the Configurations menu select FT8 | Clone (or Default | Clone).
5. Rename the resulting new configuration to FT4, and select the new configuration.
6. Select FT4 from the Mode menu.
7. On the File | Settings | Frequencies tab, right-click any line in the Working
Frequencies table and press the Reset button. This action will pick up the
recommended working frequencies for FT4.
8. Check the box Special operating activity on the Settings | Advanced tab.
Then select RTTY Roundup messages and enter your proper contest exchange
in the field RTTY RU Exch.
9. Instructions for connecting WSJT-X to N1MM Logger+ can be found in the
WSJT-X 2.1 User Guide, Section 4.5.
You now have a release candidate for WSJT-X 2.1.0 configured for FT4 operation. You
might find it useful to download and examine an FT4 sample file. Select Download
Samples from the Help menu and tick the FT4 box. Configure the Wide Graph
controls as shown in Figure 1 and select Deep on the Decode menu, then open the
sample file from the File menu. The recorded interval should produce 19 decodes, as
seen in Figure 1. Most of the decoded signals are inaudible or barely audible in the
audio file. Fewer than one-third are strong enough to be reliably decoded if they had
been RTTY signals — and only then if they were spread out over a much wider
Operation: Aside from its much shorter T/R sequences, FT4 behaves essentially the
same way as FT8. One new on-screen control is available for FT4 operation, a button
labeled Best S+P, just below the Call 1st checkbox. Clicking this button during an Rx
cycle arms the program to examine all CQ messages decoded at the end of the 6-
second Rx sequence. The program will select the best potential QSO partner (from a
contesting perspective), and treat it as if you had double-clicked on that line of decoded
text. Here “best potential QSO partner” means “New Multiplier” (1st priority) or “New
Call on Band” (2nd priority). “New Multiplier” is currently interpreted to mean “New
DXCC”; a more broadly defined multiplier category (for the ARRL RTTY Roundup rules)
will be implemented soon. We may also provide additional priority rankings, for
example “New Grid on Band” (useful for North American VHF contests), sorting by
signal strength, etc.
For keyboard control of transmitted messages, check the box Alternate F1–F6
bindings on the Settings | General tab. In typical contest-style operation you can then
hit function key F1 to solicit a QSO by sending CQ. To respond to a CQ and send your
contest exchange, double-click on the decoded message. Alternatively, you can click on
Best S+P and let the selection algorithm choose a station to call. Auto Seq and Call
1st checkboxes behave as in FT8, and thus the remainder of a minimal QSO can
continue without further operator action. Function keys F2 – F5 may be used to send
messages displayed in entry fields for Tx2 – Tx5 on tab 1, at bottom right of the main
window. Function key F6 toggles the checked status of Call 1st, and key combination
Alt+B can be used to toggle the armed status of Best S+P.
FT4 is presently configured so that a station operating in Search-and-Pounce (“S+P”)
mode logs a QSO when RR73 is transmitted, and the CQing (“Run”) station logs a QSO
when RR73 is received. Like FT8, FT4 makes little distinction between an S+P station
and a Run station. An operator can switch easily and frequently between these two
ways of initiating QSOs, and contesting skill will depend on optimizing these and many
other operating decisions. With a steady stream of available stations to work, singleradio QSO rates well above 100/hour are possible using FT4.
Transmitted signal: FT4 uses a modulation technique known as Gaussian frequency
shift keying, or GFSK. The generated audio waveform consists of 105 symbols (tones)
sent in sequence at one of four frequencies. The encoded series of distinct tones for
part of a transmission might originally look like the upper (red) curve in Figure 2.
However, in FT4 the sequence of frequencies is smoothed by convolution with a
Gaussian function before being sent to the software modulator. The blue curve shows
the corresponding smoothed sequence of frequencies actually sent to the modulator.
The transmitted sequence no longer has any stepwise discontinuities.
Differences between the red and blue curves seem rather small, but spectra of the
resulting audio waveforms are remarkably different. Figure 3 shows spectra for an FT4
signal (blue) and a standard continuous-phase FSK sigal (red) for the same encoded bit
sequence. The GFSK spectrum has steep skirts, occupying a bandwidth of only 75 Hz
at –6 dB, 200 Hz at –60 dB, and 260 Hz at –80 dB. No additional filtering is applied to
the audio waveforms.
Figure 3 also shows the spectrum of a standard RTTY signal (purple), which is more
than 2000 Hz wide at –60 dB. Some ham software generating RTTY signals by audio
frequency shift keying (AFSK) offers optional filtering of the waveform to reduce the
unwanted keying sidebands. However, such post-modulation filtering necessarily
destroys the constant-envelope nature of the continuous-phase FSK signal and leaves
behind a waveform that must be amplified with good linearity to avoid generating new
unwanted sidebands. In contrast, the GFSK signal of FT4 has a constant envelope and
is immune to inter-modulation distortion.
Decoding and Frequency Usage: The FT4 decoder in WSJT-X 2.1 identifies and
decodes signals anywhere in a passband up to 5 kHz wide. As in other WSJT-X
modes, received messages are “all or nothing” — there are no partial decodes, and
false decodes are rare. Subtraction of decoded signals from the received data stream
enables decoding of transmissions that overlap in frequency with other, possibly much
stronger signals. The last three decodes shown in the Band Activity window in Figure 1
are examples of such second-pass decodes. With the normal odd/even sequencing of
transmissions and signals spaced at intervals 120 – 150 Hz, as many as 50 stations can
operate in a 3 or 4 kHz passband with little interference, even when signal strengths
differ by as much as 60 dB.
Experience will tell what may be the best strategy for selecting dial frequencies during
contests, and for how many ~3 kHz segments should be used for FT4 on each band.
As initial guidelines we suggest the following default dial frequencies for FT4: 3.595,
7.090, 10.140, 14.140, 18.104, 21.140, 24.919, 28.180, 50.318, 144.170 MHz. We will
welcome any feedback that could lead to better frequency choices.
Sensitivity: Figure 4 presents measurements of FT4 decoder sensitivity over a wide
range of simulated propagation conditions. Paired numbers at the right give the
Doppler spread (Hz) and two-path differential delay (ms) for various sets of ITUstandard conditions, using the Watterson model for ionospheric propagation. The leftmost solid curves correspond to common mid-latitude propagation paths in undisturbed
conditions. Dashed curves show the measured sensitivities for decoding with maximum
a priori information, in two extremes of propagation conditions. For a rough comparison
with RTTY, we note that in simulated mid-latitude moderate conditions RTTY has been
shown to yield character error rates less than 10% only when SNR exceeds –1 to +4
dB, depending on the software modem in use. FT4 offers a sensitivity advantage of
about 10 dB over RTTY
Previous testing: Early release candidates of WSJT-X 2.1.0 enabled us to explore the
advisability of making FT4 an asynchronous mode with no fixed start times for T/R
intervals. These tests served to highlight the significant advantages of using timesynchronized sequences. Fixed sequence lengths with prescribed start times ensure
that a much larger fraction of received signals are decodable, especially in contest-like
operating conditions where a given station may transmit roughly half the time. In terms
normally used for communications engineering, synchronization increases channel
Schedule: A few parameters and operating behaviors of FT4 are still being tested and
optimized. It will be very useful to hold several more mock contest practice sessions,
with a larger group of active participants. Even if these reveal no serious bugs or
inadequacies, we think FT4 is too new to be used in two upcoming events: the ARRL
VHF Contest (June 8-10) and ARRL Field Day (June 22-23). Consequently we plan to
build a release candidate WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5 that will “time out” on June 7, 2019. As far
as possible, we plan to adhere to the following schedule:
• April 22: Public announcement about FT4, with a link to this document
• April 29: Second announcement, with links to downloadable installation packages
for WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5
• May 9, 0000 – 0100 UTC: FT4 practice session, 7.090 MHz
• May 14, 0000 – 0100 UTC: FT4 practice session, 7.090 MHz
• June 5, 0000 – 0100 UTC: FT4 practice session, 7.090 MHz (if needed)
• July 15: General Availability (GA) release of WSJT-X 2.1.0
Random concluding thoughts: FT4 is a special-purpose mode designed for rapid-fire
contest QSOs. It serves this purpose very effectively, but like FT8 the mode is not
useful for more extensive conversations. FT4 uses much less bandwidth than RTTY
and provides reliable decoding at much lower signal levels. It has no need for “Super
Check Partial” or similar contesting aids, and skilled operators using FT4 will find less
motivation to use a DX Cluster or other non-radio aids. All information necessary to
score well in a contest can be obtained over the air, during the contest, through one’s
own antennas and radios. With FT4 there is little distinction between CQ and S+P
operation, so it’s easy to switch frequently between the two ways of finding QSO
partners. Stations using low power and compromise antennas can participate
effectively in a contest using FT4.
Ampleon has released the first of a family of RF power devices based upon its Advanced Rugged Technology (ART) derivative of the proven 9th generation... Read more
XIEGU G1M [Entry Level QRP Transceiver] – With receiving 0.5-30 MHz generally and transmitting capabilities on four popular amateur radio bands,... Read more
4SQ-8DIR antenna system The four-square phased-vertical array if used by many contesters and DXers for oreration on the low bands. This construction m... Read more
This example is installed at KJ4AJG and is a 4el for 28MHz. Tom is so impressed, he has ordered another to stack! If you don’t see one for a ban... Read more
“If you are in the market for a high gain HT antenna for those fringe areas, this may be for you. The Diamond SRH770s is very flexible for porta... Read more
Part 1 of 2. Jim recommends in detail how he believes grounding should be installed in the typical Ham Radio Statio Read more