I frequently hear the question: how high should my dipole be? Or alternatively, will my dipole work well at this or that height? Unfortunately, these questions can not be answered without first stating what you want the dipole to actually DO, i.e. how you plan to operate with it. Some possible goals for a dipole might be:
1. DX work.
2. Local work: nets and rag chewing.
3. Directionality: gain in one direction, or nulls in some other direction
4. Omni-directionality.
5. Feed point impedance of 50 ohms.
As you may surmise, many of these potential goals are mutually exclusive, or at least tradeoffs.
However, once you define what you want to do with your dipole, then you can look at the radiation patterns to see if it will accomplish those goals.
I make the assumption that anyone reading this understands that DX work requires a low angle of radiation, with gain in the favored direction being desirable. Nets and rag chewing require a much higher angle of radiation and an omni-directional pattern. A null aimed in some direction may be desirable in various situations. Something close to 50 ohms impedance will aide matching and power transfer to/from coax cable.
There are many other potential goals for a dipole, but the ones I have listed are those that are most dependent on it’s height above ground. Thus this discussion will not touch upon the issues of multi – banded operation, tuned open wire feeders, and the like. So, lets limit the issue at hand to: how the character of a dipole varies with its height above ground.
To investigate this problem, I have modeled a hypothetical wire dipole using the EZNEC program (from W7EL). This model is well within the verified capability of EZNEC.
For those interested in the modeling details, this dipole, named D40M, has the following specifications:
Material: #12 copper wire.
Length: 69.057 feet.
Ground Type: good (.005,13) NEC Sommerfield.
Frequency: 7.00 MHz nominal, but the comparative patterns were computed by adjusting the frequency slightly for resonance at each height.
The dipole was modeled at various heights from .05 wavelengths (7 feet) to 4 wavelengths (560 feet) above good ground. One may argue that 560 feet is ridiculous for a 40 meter dipole, but keep in mind that the data can be scaled down to a 10 meter dipole with similar results.
The table below tabulates the results. In the first two columns, the antenna’s height above ground is given in wavelengths and in feet. The next two columns show the maximum gain in the favored direction (i.e. broadside to the wire), followed by the launch angle and the -3 dB vertical beam width. The next two columns once again present the gain and launch angle / beam width, but for the axial direction (off the ends of the wire). Finally, the last 2 columns list the complex impedance at the feed point, and the actual resonance frequency at that specific height.
| Height | Height | Fav Dir | Fav Dir | End Dir | End Dir | |||||
| Launch | Launch | |||||||||
| Wave | Gain | Angle/ | Gain | Angle/ | Feedpt | Res. | ||||
| Lengths | Feet | (dbi) | Bmwidth | (dbi) | Bmwidth | Z | Freq | |||
| 4.0* | 560 | 7.75 | 4 / 4 | 5.57 | 72 / 13 | 6.93 | ||||
| 3.0 | 420 | 7.83 | 5 / 5 | 5.25 | 68 / 14 | 77+ j11 | 6.94 | |||
| 2.0* | 280 | 7.80 | 7 / 7 | 0 | 39 / | 75 + j12 | 6.95 | |||
| 1.5 | 210 | 7.72 | 9 / 10 | -2.50 | 33 / | 75 + j11 | 6.96 | |||
| 1.0* | 140 | 7.64 | 14 / 15 | -11.00 | 20 / | 74 + j08 | 6.96 | |||
| .9 | 126 | 7.03 | 16 / 17 | -8.30 | 22 / | 85 + j13 | 6.94 | |||
| .8 | 112 | 7.16 | 18 / 19 | -6.40 | 25 / | 84 + j26 | 6.88 | |||
| .7* | 98 | 7.95 | 20 / 22 | -4.50 | 30 / | 70 + j30 | 6.88 | |||
| .6 | 84 | 8.35 | 23 / 26 | -1.95 | 40 / | 60 + j16 | 6.94 | |||
| .5* | 70 | 7.45 | 28 / 33 | -0.51 | 43 / 33 | 71 – j00 | 7.00 | |||
| .4 | 56 | 6.06 | 35 / 47 | 1.30 | 59 / 102 | 93 + j04 | 6.98 | |||
| .3* | 42 | 5.59 | 50 / 137 | 4.71 | 90 / 80 | 100 + j32 | 6.86 | |||
| .2 | 28 | 6.70 | 90 / 118 | 6.70 | 90 / 67 | 71 + j56 | 6.77 | |||
| .1* | 14 | 8.21 | 90 / 103 | 8.21 | 90 / 66 | 23 + j39 | 6.84 | |||
| .05 | 7 | 9.61 | 90 / 99 | 9.60 | 90 / 72 | 7 + j12 | 6.95 |
* Elevation plots shown below
The first thing to notice is that the gain in the favored (broadside) direction varies very little with height. The important change in the broadside pattern occurs in the launch angle of the primary lobe. As the antenna moves closer to the ground, the launch angle of radiation gets higher and the -3 dB vertical beam width becomes broader. Note that below the benchmark height of ½ wavelength, the launch angle increases rapidly. Once the dipole is lowered to 0.3 wavelengths, most of the radiation goes in a vertical direction. This explains the frequently heard “rule” that a dipole must be at least ½ wavelength high to work. The seeming anomaly with the beam width below 0.4 wavelengths is easier to understand by viewing the plots shown below.
One frequently sees a dipole azimuth pattern depicting a very sharp null off of the ends of a dipole. While technically accurate, this can be very misleading as the table above shows, and is a result of trying to depict a 3 dimensional pattern in 2 dimensions. This often seen null is only evident at the same launch angle as the maximum broadside gain. Of major significance is the large amount of gain off the ends at higher launch angles. Due to multiple lobes forming above ½ wavelength, this is not easily shown in tabular form. I have arbitrarily chosen to list gain and launch angle for the secondary lobe with the lowest launch angle, but recognize that there is frequently a stronger primary lobe at higher angles. Consult the plots below for a better visualization.
The reference antenna length was chosen to resonate at the ½ wavelength height. As expected, the feed point impedance oscillates significantly as the height changes from our reference point. Thus we verify the old adage that you must trim the dipole to fit your particular QTH (height being very important). The corresponding resonant frequency for each height is shown in the last column for reference, since complex impedance’s may be of less practical importance to some.
Now we are back to looking at what we want the dipole to achieve.
For DX work, higher placement is warranted, since more power concentrated between 5 and 15 degrees is reported to be of major benefit. Heights around one wavelength are necessary to get the broadside lobe to launch in this range. However, higher may not always be better. Pay careful attention to the magnitude of secondary lobes in the broadside direction, as well as high angle radiation off the ends. Some heights would appear better than others due to concerns with nulling out local QRM. A complete discussion of of this aspect is beyond the scope of this article, but may be investigated at a later date.
For local work, lower heights appear to be more beneficial. Note especially how omni-directional our dipole becomes at lower heights. Below 0.4 wavelengths, there is less than 1 dB of attenuation in the end fire direction, which suggests a height between 0.4 and 0.3 might be an ideal compromise for local nets and rag chewing.
Feed point impedance and matching does not seem to be of major concern except at very low heights. The effect of height on 2:1 SWR bandwidth was not investigated.
by Mike Banz, AA3RL as a service to the Amateur Radio community.
Please distribute freely.
Source:Link
Recent Posts
SUWS WebSDR supports Meteor Scatter enthusiasts
The SUWS WebSDR, a popular resource for the Amateur Satellite and 434 MHz High Altitude Balloon communities, has recently been upgraded to support VLF... Read more
FT8 in UK and EU contests
Recently, the RSGB Contest Committee has seen some FT8 QSOs being claimed within contest logs. At present it is difficult to complete a full contest e... Read more
QSO Today Episode 51 — Carole Perry, WB2MGP
When it comes to introducing amateur radio to kids, there is no better elmer than Carole Perry, WB2MGP. Carole captured the imagination of almost nin... Read more
Chance of Magnetic Storms this Week
GEOMAGNETIC STORM UNDERWAY: A G1-class geomagnetic storm is underway on Oct. 25th as Earth enters a stream of solar wind flowing from a coronal hole o... Read more
2016 WPX SSB Contest – Raw Scores Before Checking
Photo: CN2AA Raw Scores Before Checking 2016 WPX SSB Contest Raw scores as calculated before log checking. Last update: 2016-04-06 Please report any e... Read more
3D Hologram Hytera DMR Radio Demo
Hytera DMR Radio Read more
How to Set-Up and Master Ham Radio Without Going Crazy, Part 1
” On April 18th, I will be taking the test to get my Technician Class HAM radio license. This is something I have been meaning to do for quite... Read more
Historic first Trans-Atlantic contact made on 432 MHz – Tues 7th April 2020
On Tuesday the 7th of April 2020, a remarkable contact was made on the FT8 digital mode on 432 MHz between D4VHF on the Cape Verde Islands off the coa... Read more
Two SSTV events during July 29 – August 4
Below is the scheduled (as of July 22) for the planned activation of SSTV from the ISS. The first session is the routine MAI-75 activity that is only... Read more
Asteroid Named After Radio Amateur
The International Astronomical Union on 13 April, rewarded the space physicist and radio amateur Asta Pellinen-Wannberg, SM3UHV, by designating a cele... Read more
![ARRL – Teachers Institute Overview [ Video ]](https://qrznow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/CO-TI-1-2016-6742-1-190x122.jpg)
ARRL – Teachers Institute Overview [ Video ]
An Introduction to the ARRL Teacher’s Institute on Wireless Technology. Part of ARRL’s educational outreach to schools through our Educati... Read more
Elad FDM-S3 SDR
— WIDEBAND DIRECT SAMPLING RECEIVER —- JAN 2020 SPECIFICATIONS 2 switchable HF Antenna inputs direct sampling 1 VHF Antenna input direct s... Read more
AIRSPY – SDR Software Download Update
Windows SDR Software Package (Change log)This package contains:SDR# (SDRSharp) x86 revision 1756 2991c02 (2020-09-23) – The best free SDR so... Read more
Disappointment for Cows Over the World
Tom, KC0W, and his all-CW ‘Cows Over the World’ DXpeditions have come to a halt at the moment. He reports on QRZ.com, September 10th:... Read more
Unboxing TYT MD-380 – HRN 267
Unboxing a TYT MD-380 DMR HT, and a lot more rambling (because we don’t do unboxings). I also talk about the BTech (BaoFeng) UV 5×3 tri-ban... Read more
A Sunspot Fizzles While Storms Head to Earth: Solar Storm Forecast: 03-08-2018
“The Sun’s activity both fizzles and picks up this week. Old region 2699 that we had high hopes would boost the solar flux as it rotated i... Read more
A ‘Hole’ In the Sun Could Make the Northern Lights Visible as Far South as North Carolina
By Jay Bennett High energy particles spewing from a hole in the sun’s atmosphere will make the aurora borealis particularly magnificent this wee... Read more
New Jersey Radio Amateur Receives International Astronomical League’s Gold Certification
Blair Hearth, KD2EPA, of Oceanport, New Jersey, has joined the select group of individuals who have received Gold certification in the Radio Astronomy... Read more
ICOM – New release of IP700, the industry’s first hybrid IP transceiver
IP transceiver and digital simple radio in one Product name / model name Hybrid IP transceiver / IP700 Suggested retail price Open price Release date... Read more
MacLoggerDX Version 6.20 Released
Dog Park Software is pleased to announce that version 6.20 of MacLoggerDX has been released. What’s New in this version: * Requires OS X 10.9+.... Read more
Warning: file_get_contents(https://plusone.google.com/_/+1/fastbutton?url=https%3A%2F%2Fqrznow.com%2Fhigh-dipole-antenna%2F): failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.0 404 Not Found in /home/qrznow/public_html/wp-content/themes/goodnews5/framework/functions/posts_share.php on line 151
