I frequently hear the question: how high should my dipole be? Or alternatively, will my dipole work well at this or that height? Unfortunately, these questions can not be answered without first stating what you want the dipole to actually DO, i.e. how you plan to operate with it. Some possible goals for a dipole might be:
1. DX work.
2. Local work: nets and rag chewing.
3. Directionality: gain in one direction, or nulls in some other direction
4. Omni-directionality.
5. Feed point impedance of 50 ohms.
As you may surmise, many of these potential goals are mutually exclusive, or at least tradeoffs.
However, once you define what you want to do with your dipole, then you can look at the radiation patterns to see if it will accomplish those goals.
I make the assumption that anyone reading this understands that DX work requires a low angle of radiation, with gain in the favored direction being desirable. Nets and rag chewing require a much higher angle of radiation and an omni-directional pattern. A null aimed in some direction may be desirable in various situations. Something close to 50 ohms impedance will aide matching and power transfer to/from coax cable.
There are many other potential goals for a dipole, but the ones I have listed are those that are most dependent on it’s height above ground. Thus this discussion will not touch upon the issues of multi – banded operation, tuned open wire feeders, and the like. So, lets limit the issue at hand to: how the character of a dipole varies with its height above ground.
To investigate this problem, I have modeled a hypothetical wire dipole using the EZNEC program (from W7EL). This model is well within the verified capability of EZNEC.
For those interested in the modeling details, this dipole, named D40M, has the following specifications:
Material: #12 copper wire.
Length: 69.057 feet.
Ground Type: good (.005,13) NEC Sommerfield.
Frequency: 7.00 MHz nominal, but the comparative patterns were computed by adjusting the frequency slightly for resonance at each height.
The dipole was modeled at various heights from .05 wavelengths (7 feet) to 4 wavelengths (560 feet) above good ground. One may argue that 560 feet is ridiculous for a 40 meter dipole, but keep in mind that the data can be scaled down to a 10 meter dipole with similar results.
The table below tabulates the results. In the first two columns, the antenna’s height above ground is given in wavelengths and in feet. The next two columns show the maximum gain in the favored direction (i.e. broadside to the wire), followed by the launch angle and the -3 dB vertical beam width. The next two columns once again present the gain and launch angle / beam width, but for the axial direction (off the ends of the wire). Finally, the last 2 columns list the complex impedance at the feed point, and the actual resonance frequency at that specific height.
| Height | Height | Fav Dir | Fav Dir | End Dir | End Dir | |||||
| Launch | Launch | |||||||||
| Wave | Gain | Angle/ | Gain | Angle/ | Feedpt | Res. | ||||
| Lengths | Feet | (dbi) | Bmwidth | (dbi) | Bmwidth | Z | Freq | |||
| 4.0* | 560 | 7.75 | 4 / 4 | 5.57 | 72 / 13 | 6.93 | ||||
| 3.0 | 420 | 7.83 | 5 / 5 | 5.25 | 68 / 14 | 77+ j11 | 6.94 | |||
| 2.0* | 280 | 7.80 | 7 / 7 | 0 | 39 / | 75 + j12 | 6.95 | |||
| 1.5 | 210 | 7.72 | 9 / 10 | -2.50 | 33 / | 75 + j11 | 6.96 | |||
| 1.0* | 140 | 7.64 | 14 / 15 | -11.00 | 20 / | 74 + j08 | 6.96 | |||
| .9 | 126 | 7.03 | 16 / 17 | -8.30 | 22 / | 85 + j13 | 6.94 | |||
| .8 | 112 | 7.16 | 18 / 19 | -6.40 | 25 / | 84 + j26 | 6.88 | |||
| .7* | 98 | 7.95 | 20 / 22 | -4.50 | 30 / | 70 + j30 | 6.88 | |||
| .6 | 84 | 8.35 | 23 / 26 | -1.95 | 40 / | 60 + j16 | 6.94 | |||
| .5* | 70 | 7.45 | 28 / 33 | -0.51 | 43 / 33 | 71 – j00 | 7.00 | |||
| .4 | 56 | 6.06 | 35 / 47 | 1.30 | 59 / 102 | 93 + j04 | 6.98 | |||
| .3* | 42 | 5.59 | 50 / 137 | 4.71 | 90 / 80 | 100 + j32 | 6.86 | |||
| .2 | 28 | 6.70 | 90 / 118 | 6.70 | 90 / 67 | 71 + j56 | 6.77 | |||
| .1* | 14 | 8.21 | 90 / 103 | 8.21 | 90 / 66 | 23 + j39 | 6.84 | |||
| .05 | 7 | 9.61 | 90 / 99 | 9.60 | 90 / 72 | 7 + j12 | 6.95 |
* Elevation plots shown below
The first thing to notice is that the gain in the favored (broadside) direction varies very little with height. The important change in the broadside pattern occurs in the launch angle of the primary lobe. As the antenna moves closer to the ground, the launch angle of radiation gets higher and the -3 dB vertical beam width becomes broader. Note that below the benchmark height of ½ wavelength, the launch angle increases rapidly. Once the dipole is lowered to 0.3 wavelengths, most of the radiation goes in a vertical direction. This explains the frequently heard “rule” that a dipole must be at least ½ wavelength high to work. The seeming anomaly with the beam width below 0.4 wavelengths is easier to understand by viewing the plots shown below.
One frequently sees a dipole azimuth pattern depicting a very sharp null off of the ends of a dipole. While technically accurate, this can be very misleading as the table above shows, and is a result of trying to depict a 3 dimensional pattern in 2 dimensions. This often seen null is only evident at the same launch angle as the maximum broadside gain. Of major significance is the large amount of gain off the ends at higher launch angles. Due to multiple lobes forming above ½ wavelength, this is not easily shown in tabular form. I have arbitrarily chosen to list gain and launch angle for the secondary lobe with the lowest launch angle, but recognize that there is frequently a stronger primary lobe at higher angles. Consult the plots below for a better visualization.
The reference antenna length was chosen to resonate at the ½ wavelength height. As expected, the feed point impedance oscillates significantly as the height changes from our reference point. Thus we verify the old adage that you must trim the dipole to fit your particular QTH (height being very important). The corresponding resonant frequency for each height is shown in the last column for reference, since complex impedance’s may be of less practical importance to some.
Now we are back to looking at what we want the dipole to achieve.
For DX work, higher placement is warranted, since more power concentrated between 5 and 15 degrees is reported to be of major benefit. Heights around one wavelength are necessary to get the broadside lobe to launch in this range. However, higher may not always be better. Pay careful attention to the magnitude of secondary lobes in the broadside direction, as well as high angle radiation off the ends. Some heights would appear better than others due to concerns with nulling out local QRM. A complete discussion of of this aspect is beyond the scope of this article, but may be investigated at a later date.
For local work, lower heights appear to be more beneficial. Note especially how omni-directional our dipole becomes at lower heights. Below 0.4 wavelengths, there is less than 1 dB of attenuation in the end fire direction, which suggests a height between 0.4 and 0.3 might be an ideal compromise for local nets and rag chewing.
Feed point impedance and matching does not seem to be of major concern except at very low heights. The effect of height on 2:1 SWR bandwidth was not investigated.
by Mike Banz, AA3RL as a service to the Amateur Radio community.
Please distribute freely.
Source:Link
Recent Posts
GLOBAL COVID-19 “STAYHOME” Campaign Deemed a Success
The June 6 – 7 COVID-19 “STAYHOME” Radio Communication Event was a “great success,” its sponsors said, with more than 6,000 participants worldwide. Th... Read more
LightSail 2 Launches, Will Transmit CW Beacon
The Planetary Society’s LightSail 2 CubeSat, launched on June 25, will transmit Morse code from space. LightSail is a citizen-funded project to send a... Read more
FM / VHF Operating Guide by K0NR
FM/ VHF Operating Guide By Bob Witte, KØNR This guide is intended to assist new amateur radio operators in figuring out what VHF FM and repeater opera... Read more
![Yaesu FT-991 HF – UHF Transceiver [ Video ]](https://qrznow.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/FT-991-190x122.jpg)
Yaesu FT-991 HF – UHF Transceiver [ Video ]
Universal-Radio presents the Yaesu FT-991 HF – UHF Transceiver Read more
![Handheld Transceiver Antennas – The Doctor Will See You Now! [PODCAST]](https://qrznow.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/shootout-190x122.jpg)
Handheld Transceiver Antennas – The Doctor Will See You Now! [PODCAST]
Most handheld transceivers come equipped with so-called “rubber duck” antennas. They aren’t very efficient antennas, b... Read more
Slow Scan TV from ISS January 30-31
Russian cosmonauts are expected to activate Slow Scan Television (SSTV) image transmissions on 145.800 MHz FM from the International Space Station on... Read more
![Updating the Firmware – Icom IC-7610 [ VIDEO ]](https://qrznow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/IC7610-190x122.jpg)
Updating the Firmware – Icom IC-7610 [ VIDEO ]
Step by step instructions showing how to update the firmware using a USB thumb drive Faint signals are no longer a challenge for DXers and Contesters... Read more
FO-29 Satellite Contact Claims Distance Record
Dave Swanson, KG5CCI, of Little Rock, Arkansas, and Christophe Lucas, F4CQA, in Trouy, France, appear to have set a new contact distance record on the... Read more
NASA releases first sounds ever recorded on Mars Read
Listen to Martian wind blow across NASA’s InSight lander. The spacecraft’s seismometer and air pressure sensor picked up vibrations from 10-15 mph (16... Read more
HF Clock / Satellite Tracker /Solar Index Touchscreen Terminal
HFClock Internet Based Clock System – 9″ Tiger Maple Frame The HFClockTM represents the industry’s first highly integrated clock designed... Read more
Turn Your Smartphone into a Powerful Walkie Talkie
The Beartooth case is actually two handy tools in one — it’s one part 2,000mAh backup battery and one part VHF/UHF radio. Wrap the Beartooth ar... Read more
The Super Elastic Signal Stick antenna review and testing
< Who is Signal Stuff? In a world where Amateur Radio ought to be on the cutting edge of technology, far too often hams are seen as being “old s... Read more
UBA PSK63 Prefix Contest
UBA PSK63 Prefix Contest 1. Date 10 january 2015, 12:00 UTC until 11 january 2015, 12:00 UTC. (every year the 2nd weekend of january) 2... Read more
New Ham Bands Spring to Life; Veteran LF Experimenter Denied Amateur Access to 2200 Meters
Photo:VO1NA Amateur Radio’s two newest bands came to life on Friday the 13th. Both 630 meters (472-479 kHz) and 2200 meters (135.7-137.8 kHz) bands no... Read more
HAMJAM 2015
HamJam 2015 will take place on Saturday, November 14th at the Metropolitan Club, 5895 Windward Pkwy, Alpharetta, GA. NFARL and our sponsors are please... Read more
RTL-SDR VS SDRPlay
A Comparison between the rtl-sdr and sdrplay across different frequencies and settings. Measuring the signal to noise ratio and graphing results.... Read more
Contest Committee to relax COVID-19 rules
As we’re all aware, the changes to COVID-19 restrictions have been coming thick and fast recently, but they have also remained inconsistent across the... Read more
Gender imbalance in Ham Radio
An astrophysicist writes on Reddit about why she will no longer use the patronising and condescending term YL In a thought provoking article Yvette Ce... Read more
Sares to provide radio communications support during flood
Sares to provide radio communications support during flood News from http://www.thesundaily.my/ Read more
InLogis RF-PRO-1B Active Magnetic Loop Antennas RF-PRO-1B
Loop Antennas HF Receive Antenna Type:Shielded Magnetic Loop HF Receive Antenna Remote Mounting Position:Elevated HF Receive Antenna Style:One-pie... Read more
Warning: file_get_contents(https://plusone.google.com/_/+1/fastbutton?url=https%3A%2F%2Fqrznow.com%2Fhigh-dipole-antenna%2F): failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.0 404 Not Found in /home/qrznow/public_html/wp-content/themes/goodnews5/framework/functions/posts_share.php on line 151
